Template talk:ContentTag: Difference between revisions
From EHWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Maximum Joe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Maximum Joe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:[[amputee|Amputee]]'s Type says "Attribute", which isn't in the Fetish Listing; and "amputee" itself shows up in two places in the listing. And that's hardly the only tag with such problems, I'm sure. I don't know how you want this to work. Besides which, Costume/Animal are already pointing to [[Gallery Tagging#Usage Guidelines]]... [[User:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore|PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore]] ([[User talk:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore|talk]]) 17:26, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | :[[amputee|Amputee]]'s Type says "Attribute", which isn't in the Fetish Listing; and "amputee" itself shows up in two places in the listing. And that's hardly the only tag with such problems, I'm sure. I don't know how you want this to work. Besides which, Costume/Animal are already pointing to [[Gallery Tagging#Usage Guidelines]]... [[User:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore|PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore]] ([[User talk:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore|talk]]) 17:26, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
::The fetish listing you have created Joe, is very good. It gives users a very easy way to overview every tag we have. IMO we should start using it as soon as possible. -[[User:Binglo|Binglo]] ([[User talk:Binglo|talk]]) 17:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | ::The fetish listing you have created Joe, is very good. It gives users a very easy way to overview every tag we have. IMO we should start using it as soon as possible. -[[User:Binglo|Binglo]] ([[User talk:Binglo|talk]]) 17:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::PDDNM, it's not meant to mimic the "types" in tag articles at all, and things can be listed under several fetishes. binglo, yea it needs at least one more going over, and a home for the (Other) tags. - [[User:Maximum Joe|Maximum Joe]] ([[User talk:Maximum Joe|talk]]) 02:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC) | :::PDDNM, it's not meant to mimic the "types" in tag articles at all, and things can be listed under several fetishes. binglo, yea it needs at least one more going over, and a home for the (Other) tags. The types should probably receive subtypes. Here's an example for [[piss drinking]]: | ||
:::*'''Type''': Attribute - [[Fetish Listing#Mouth|Mouth]], [[Fetish Listing#Bodily Waste|Bodily Waste]] | |||
:::- [[User:Maximum Joe|Maximum Joe]] ([[User talk:Maximum Joe|talk]]) 02:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:28, 25 March 2013
Could you re-point all "type values" to their respective fetish listing? -Binglo (talk) 13:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Eh, that page is still being tweaked. I'd like to make sure no tag ends up in the (Other) subsection if possible. - Maximum Joe (talk) 14:46, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- Amputee's Type says "Attribute", which isn't in the Fetish Listing; and "amputee" itself shows up in two places in the listing. And that's hardly the only tag with such problems, I'm sure. I don't know how you want this to work. Besides which, Costume/Animal are already pointing to Gallery Tagging#Usage Guidelines... PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore (talk) 17:26, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- The fetish listing you have created Joe, is very good. It gives users a very easy way to overview every tag we have. IMO we should start using it as soon as possible. -Binglo (talk) 17:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- PDDNM, it's not meant to mimic the "types" in tag articles at all, and things can be listed under several fetishes. binglo, yea it needs at least one more going over, and a home for the (Other) tags. The types should probably receive subtypes. Here's an example for piss drinking:
- Type: Attribute - Mouth, Bodily Waste
- - Maximum Joe (talk) 02:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- PDDNM, it's not meant to mimic the "types" in tag articles at all, and things can be listed under several fetishes. binglo, yea it needs at least one more going over, and a home for the (Other) tags. The types should probably receive subtypes. Here's an example for piss drinking:
- The fetish listing you have created Joe, is very good. It gives users a very easy way to overview every tag we have. IMO we should start using it as soon as possible. -Binglo (talk) 17:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
