Template talk:ContentTag: Difference between revisions

From EHWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Maximum Joe (talk | contribs)
brain fart
Line 4: Line 4:
::The fetish listing you have created Joe, is very good. It gives users a very easy way to overview every tag we have. IMO we should start using it as soon as possible. -[[User:Binglo|Binglo]] ([[User talk:Binglo|talk]]) 17:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
::The fetish listing you have created Joe, is very good. It gives users a very easy way to overview every tag we have. IMO we should start using it as soon as possible. -[[User:Binglo|Binglo]] ([[User talk:Binglo|talk]]) 17:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
:::PDDNM, it's not meant to mimic the "types" in tag articles at all, and things can be listed under several fetishes. binglo, yea it needs at least one more going over, and a home for the (Other) tags. The types should probably receive subtypes. Here's an example for [[piss drinking]]:
:::PDDNM, it's not meant to mimic the "types" in tag articles at all, and things can be listed under several fetishes. binglo, yea it needs at least one more going over, and a home for the (Other) tags. The types should probably receive subtypes. Here's an example for [[piss drinking]]:
:::*'''Type''': Attribute - [[Fetish Listing#Mouth|Mouth]], [[Fetish Listing#Bodily Waste|Bodily Waste]]
:::*'''Type''': Activity - [[Fetish Listing#Mouth|Mouth]], [[Fetish Listing#Bodily Waste|Bodily Waste]]
:::- [[User:Maximum Joe|Maximum Joe]] ([[User talk:Maximum Joe|talk]]) 02:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
:::- [[User:Maximum Joe|Maximum Joe]] ([[User talk:Maximum Joe|talk]]) 02:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
::::Yeah, that's doable...I'll set that up in a while. [[User:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore|PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore]] ([[User talk:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore|talk]]) 12:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
::::Yeah, that's doable...I'll set that up in a while. [[User:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore|PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore]] ([[User talk:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore|talk]]) 12:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:51, 25 March 2013

Could you re-point all "type values" to their respective fetish listing? -Binglo (talk) 13:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Eh, that page is still being tweaked. I'd like to make sure no tag ends up in the (Other) subsection if possible. - Maximum Joe (talk) 14:46, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Amputee's Type says "Attribute", which isn't in the Fetish Listing; and "amputee" itself shows up in two places in the listing. And that's hardly the only tag with such problems, I'm sure. I don't know how you want this to work. Besides which, Costume/Animal are already pointing to Gallery Tagging#Usage Guidelines... PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore (talk) 17:26, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
The fetish listing you have created Joe, is very good. It gives users a very easy way to overview every tag we have. IMO we should start using it as soon as possible. -Binglo (talk) 17:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
PDDNM, it's not meant to mimic the "types" in tag articles at all, and things can be listed under several fetishes. binglo, yea it needs at least one more going over, and a home for the (Other) tags. The types should probably receive subtypes. Here's an example for piss drinking:
- Maximum Joe (talk) 02:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, that's doable...I'll set that up in a while. PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore (talk) 12:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)