|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Just got a visit from Mikuru and she did not hit me with an unspecified damage attack. She hit me with Time Quake which registered as a Dark Attack which was apparently her Spirit Attack. Perhaps we should add a Spirit Attack Column for the legendaries? [[User:Sonic|Sonic]] 10:24, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
| | I got tired of not knowing what to call monster attacks, so I decided to add some definitions. I went with "Skill" and "Spirit Attack", because using "Magic Attack" for attacks that may be physical is a little confusing, and I couldn't think of anything better for Spirit (and "Soul Attack" is just wrong). --[[User:Sayoaisaka|Sayo]] 10:34, 22 December 2009 (UTC) |
| | |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| | |
| I think separate pages for each special attack shouldn't be necessary, so I suggest we remove those links to make things look a little better. [[User:3d0xp0xy|3d0xp0xy]] 07:41, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| - I agree with 3d0xp0xy, unless there is any actual reason to have a new page such as for an explanation to a reference, but this is mostly unnecessary. The easiest solution would be to have a trivia section at the bottom of the page or something (something I was going to try and do for the original bestiary, but never did).
| |
| --[[User:Spectre|Spectre]] 07:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Oh, and references could be explained on the monster pages themselves I suppose. --[[User:YoungHickory|YoungHickory]] 08:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| -- We need individual monster pages? Having individual pages for the monsters would essentially be repeating information on this page. =p --[[User:Spectre|Spectre]] 09:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| --- I think you're right about that, unless the suggestion for monster graphics is implemented. Removed for now. --[[User:3d0xp0xy|3d0xp0xy]] 11:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| - Even still we could just add another column to the table and put the images there. --[[User:Spectre|Spectre]] 11:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| -- Yes, if the graphics would be icon sized. --[[User:3d0xp0xy|3d0xp0xy]] 12:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| - We (probably me) could make them icon sized, and upload both the original and the icon, put the icon in the table and have the icon link to the full image. At least that's how I would do it. --[[User:Spectre|Spectre]] 12:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| - Of course, what was I thinking? --[[User:3d0xp0xy|3d0xp0xy]] 12:25, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| | |
| I went ahead and removed the links, plus that I split the Attack column in Name and Element, and added a border to the table. Good? Bad? --[[User:3d0xp0xy|3d0xp0xy]] 08:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| If a monster has multiple attacks (Do they have spirit attacks the way they used to have legendaries? Or multiple spells? Will they?) the table will need rejiggered, but I guess this works for now. --[[User:YoungHickory|YoungHickory]] 08:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Legendary monsters could be added to a separate table, either here or in a new article. --[[User:3d0xp0xy|3d0xp0xy]] 09:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| - I would add Horizontal lines in the talk page to separate different subjects. @3d0xp0xy: I would put Resistance and Weakness next to the monsters name, then follow it with the attack and attack element, it would probably flow better. @YoungHickory: We can fiddle with the table later to cover that. A new article is probably not needed, a new table is debatable, but we'll figure that out when comes the time.
| |
| --[[User:Spectre|Spectre]] 09:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| -- Columns reordered. I also changed "Ice" to "Cold" for consistency. --[[User:3d0xp0xy|3d0xp0xy]] 11:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| --Now that it seems like we've found two legendaries, should we split the table? If the trend continues, all their special attacks are Unspecified, and they may have multiple resistances. --[[User:3d0xp0xy|3d0xp0xy]] 01:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| | |
| Electric / Electrical / Elec? --[[User:3d0xp0xy|3d0xp0xy]] 12:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| - Elec is what is written in HV, but it may easily be Electric. You can always ask kru (Tenboro) about it. --[[User:Spectre|Spectre]] 12:33, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| -- I think I'll change it to Elec (for consistency with what's displayed in HV). Also, why do you call him kru again? --[[User:3d0xp0xy|3d0xp0xy]] 13:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| How about adding a column or info stating what kind of monster it is eg Caster, Tank, Physical...
| |
| [[User:Flint|Flint]] 20:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ----
| |
| Amphibious Spermwhale just hit me with 'Ambergris Alert' (soul), prolly a Spirit Attack. New Column?
| |
| [[User:Flint|Flint]] 15:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | |
|
| |
|
| ---- | | ---- |
|
| |
|
| | | Something needs to be added to account for [http://forums.e-hentai.org/index.php?s=&showtopic=21231&view=findpost&p=577253 this]. Obviously none of us have details, so pestering Hito or Tens is necessary. |
| I was able to do some proper research into monster resistances/weaknesses thanks to Item World (Flimsy + Battletoads = weak monsters with lots of HP). Strategy: Hit the same monster with each different spell type as many times as possible, and record the results. I was using all 2nd tier elementals vs Condemn, and I don't have Dark yet, so YMMV. Also, what counts as a "minor weakness" is open to debate... The only mini-boss I couldn't get to turn up was the Manthra, so he still needs to be checked. --[[User:Sayoaisaka|Sayo]] 19:33, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Manthra now verified btw, and I've added info on various bosses and legendaries.
| |
| | |
| | |
| ----
| |
| | |
| | |
| I got tired of not knowing what to call monster attacks, so I decided to add some definitions. I went with "Skill" and "Spirit Attack", because using "Magic Attack" for attacks that may be physical is a little confusing, and I couldn't think of anything better for Spirit (and "Soul Attack" is just wrong). --[[User:Sayoaisaka|Sayo]] 10:34, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
I got tired of not knowing what to call monster attacks, so I decided to add some definitions. I went with "Skill" and "Spirit Attack", because using "Magic Attack" for attacks that may be physical is a little confusing, and I couldn't think of anything better for Spirit (and "Soul Attack" is just wrong). --Sayo 10:34, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Something needs to be added to account for this. Obviously none of us have details, so pestering Hito or Tens is necessary.
