Talk:System Monsters

I think separate pages for each special attack shouldn't be necessary, so I suggest we remove those links to make things look a little better. 3d0xp0xy 07:41, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

- I agree with 3d0xp0xy, unless there is any actual reason to have a new page such as for an explanation to a reference, but this is mostly unnecessary. The easiest solution would be to have a trivia section at the bottom of the page or something (something I was going to try and do for the original bestiary, but never did). --Spectre 07:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and references could be explained on the monster pages themselves I suppose. --YoungHickory 08:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

-- We need individual monster pages? Having individual pages for the monsters would essentially be repeating information on this page. =p --Spectre 09:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

--- I think you're right about that, unless the suggestion for monster graphics is implemented. Removed for now. --3d0xp0xy 11:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

- Even still we could just add another column to the table and put the images there. --Spectre 11:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

-- Yes, if the graphics would be icon sized. --3d0xp0xy 12:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

- We (probably me) could make them icon sized, and upload both the original and the icon, put the icon in the table and have the icon link to the full image. At least that's how I would do it. --Spectre 12:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

---

I went ahead and removed the links, plus that I split the Attack column in Name and Element, and added a border to the table. Good? Bad? --3d0xp0xy 08:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

If a monster has multiple attacks (Do they have spirit attacks the way they used to have legendaries? Or multiple spells? Will they?) the table will need rejiggered, but I guess this works for now. --YoungHickory 08:44, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Legendary monsters could be added to a separate table, either here or in a new article. --3d0xp0xy 09:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

- I would add Horizontal lines in the talk page to separate different subjects. @3d0xp0xy: I would put Resistance and Weakness next to the monsters name, then follow it with the attack and attack element, it would probably flow better. @YoungHickory: We can fiddle with the table later to cover that. A new article is probably not needed, a new table is debatable, but we'll figure that out when comes the time. --Spectre 09:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

-- Columns reordered. I also changed "Ice" to "Cold" for consistency. --3d0xp0xy 11:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)