Talk:twins - Revision history

PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore at 20:33, 9 May 2013

2013-05-09T20:33:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 9 May 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Remember that the tag actually stands for "having sex with twins", hence why it was categorized as an "Activity". An "Attribute" implies that being a part of a pair of twins is enough for the tag. Be careful not to take master tags too literally. Using both categories for now. - [[User:Maximum Joe\|Maximum Joe]] ([[User talk:Maximum Joe\|talk]]) 17:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)		Remember that the tag actually stands for "having sex with twins", hence why it was categorized as an "Activity". An "Attribute" implies that being a part of a pair of twins is enough for the tag. Be careful not to take master tags too literally. Using both categories for now. - [[User:Maximum Joe\|Maximum Joe]] ([[User talk:Maximum Joe\|talk]]) 17:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
	:"Twin" could imply what you suggest. "Twin'''S'''" implies that ''both'' of the ''twins'' are taggable. Besides, if someone is already on this page and sees "Attribute", they can also see the definition. <_< If there's someone who can visit this page and manage to only draw conclusions from the Type, completely missing the Description, I somehow doubt that "Activity" is going to prevent them from mistagging. If you really feel it needs clarification, the best way is to add an explicit/loud note to the effect that "both twins must be having sex"; "Activity" is a wholly inadequate way to communicate that. [[User:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore\|PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore]] ([[User talk:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore\|talk]]) 20:18, 9 May 2013 (UTC)		:"Twin" could imply what you suggest. "Twin'''S'''" implies that ''both'' of the ''twins'' are taggable. Besides, if someone is already on this page and sees "Attribute", they can also see the definition. <_< If there's someone who can visit this page and manage to only draw conclusions from the Type, completely missing the Description, I somehow doubt that "Activity" is going to prevent them from mistagging. If you really feel it needs clarification, the best way is to add an explicit/loud note to the effect that "both twins must be having sex"; "Activity" is a wholly inadequate way to communicate that. [[User:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore\|PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore]] ([[User talk:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore\|talk]]) 20:18, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
			:Oh, and as far as "it stands for 'having sex with twins'", the exact same logic applies to [[milf]] and [[old lady]] and their male versions. (Arguably it applies to every "Attribute" tag.) Should those be "Activities" as well? "Twins" is inherently ''only'' an Attribute. The fact that the twins must be having sex is simply something that a good tagger should understand. (Or, again, if you absolutely think it must be clarified, labelling it an "Activity" is entirely inadequate.) But that doesn't make the tag an "Activity". "Twins" has ''nothing'' in common with other activites like "blowjob" or "anal". [[User:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore\|PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore]] ([[User talk:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore\|talk]]) 20:33, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore at 20:18, 9 May 2013

2013-05-09T20:18:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:18, 9 May 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Remember that the tag actually stands for "having sex with twins", hence why it was categorized as an "Activity". An "Attribute" implies that being a part of a pair of twins is enough for the tag. Be careful not to take master tags too literally. Using both categories for now. - [[User:Maximum Joe\|Maximum Joe]] ([[User talk:Maximum Joe\|talk]]) 17:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)		Remember that the tag actually stands for "having sex with twins", hence why it was categorized as an "Activity". An "Attribute" implies that being a part of a pair of twins is enough for the tag. Be careful not to take master tags too literally. Using both categories for now. - [[User:Maximum Joe\|Maximum Joe]] ([[User talk:Maximum Joe\|talk]]) 17:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
			:"Twin" could imply what you suggest. "Twin'''S'''" implies that ''both'' of the ''twins'' are taggable. Besides, if someone is already on this page and sees "Attribute", they can also see the definition. <_< If there's someone who can visit this page and manage to only draw conclusions from the Type, completely missing the Description, I somehow doubt that "Activity" is going to prevent them from mistagging. If you really feel it needs clarification, the best way is to add an explicit/loud note to the effect that "both twins must be having sex"; "Activity" is a wholly inadequate way to communicate that. [[User:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore\|PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore]] ([[User talk:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore\|talk]]) 20:18, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Maximum Joe at 18:17, 9 May 2013

2013-05-09T18:17:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 9 May 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Remember that the tag ~~actual~~ stands for "having sex with twins", hence why it was categorized as an "Activity". An "Attribute" implies that being a part of a pair of twins is enough for the tag. Be careful not to take master tags too literally. - [[User:Maximum Joe\|Maximum Joe]] ([[User talk:Maximum Joe\|talk]]) 17:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)		Remember that the tag actually stands for "having sex with twins", hence why it was categorized as an "Activity". An "Attribute" implies that being a part of a pair of twins is enough for the tag. Be careful not to take master tags too literally. Using both categories for now. - [[User:Maximum Joe\|Maximum Joe]] ([[User talk:Maximum Joe\|talk]]) 17:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Maximum Joe: Created page with "Remember that the tag actual stands for "having sex with twins", hence why it was categorized as an "Activity". An "Attribute" implies that being a part of a pair of twins is ..."

2013-05-09T17:41:41Z

Created page with "Remember that the tag actual stands for "having sex with twins", hence why it was categorized as an "Activity". An "Attribute" implies that being a part of a pair of twins is ..."

New page

Remember that the tag actual stands for "having sex with twins", hence why it was categorized as an "Activity". An "Attribute" implies that being a part of a pair of twins is enough for the tag. Be careful not to take master tags too literally. - [[User:Maximum Joe|Maximum Joe]] ([[User talk:Maximum Joe|talk]]) 17:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 9 May 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Remember that the tag actually stands for "having sex with twins", hence why it was categorized as an "Activity". An "Attribute" implies that being a part of a pair of twins is enough for the tag. Be careful not to take master tags too literally. Using both categories for now. - [[User:Maximum Joe\|Maximum Joe]] ([[User talk:Maximum Joe\|talk]]) 17:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)		Remember that the tag actually stands for "having sex with twins", hence why it was categorized as an "Activity". An "Attribute" implies that being a part of a pair of twins is enough for the tag. Be careful not to take master tags too literally. Using both categories for now. - [[User:Maximum Joe\|Maximum Joe]] ([[User talk:Maximum Joe\|talk]]) 17:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
	:"Twin" could imply what you suggest. "Twin'''S'''" implies that ''both'' of the ''twins'' are taggable. Besides, if someone is already on this page and sees "Attribute", they can also see the definition. <_< If there's someone who can visit this page and manage to only draw conclusions from the Type, completely missing the Description, I somehow doubt that "Activity" is going to prevent them from mistagging. If you really feel it needs clarification, the best way is to add an explicit/loud note to the effect that "both twins must be having sex"; "Activity" is a wholly inadequate way to communicate that. [[User:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore\|PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore]] ([[User talk:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore\|talk]]) 20:18, 9 May 2013 (UTC)		:"Twin" could imply what you suggest. "Twin'''S'''" implies that ''both'' of the ''twins'' are taggable. Besides, if someone is already on this page and sees "Attribute", they can also see the definition. <_< If there's someone who can visit this page and manage to only draw conclusions from the Type, completely missing the Description, I somehow doubt that "Activity" is going to prevent them from mistagging. If you really feel it needs clarification, the best way is to add an explicit/loud note to the effect that "both twins must be having sex"; "Activity" is a wholly inadequate way to communicate that. [[User:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore\|PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore]] ([[User talk:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore\|talk]]) 20:18, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
			:Oh, and as far as "it stands for 'having sex with twins'", the exact same logic applies to [[milf]] and [[old lady]] and their male versions. (Arguably it applies to every "Attribute" tag.) Should those be "Activities" as well? "Twins" is inherently ''only'' an Attribute. The fact that the twins must be having sex is simply something that a good tagger should understand. (Or, again, if you absolutely think it must be clarified, labelling it an "Activity" is entirely inadequate.) But that doesn't make the tag an "Activity". "Twins" has ''nothing'' in common with other activites like "blowjob" or "anal". [[User:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore\|PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore]] ([[User talk:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore\|talk]]) 20:33, 9 May 2013 (UTC)