Talk:Character Stats - Revision history

Ewq23 at 15:08, 25 June 2013

2013-06-25T15:08:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:08, 25 June 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:
	It means the base of the log. mathematically equivalent to division by log(1.0003). --[[User:Lement\|Lement]] (13:36, 25 June 2013 (UTC)		It means the base of the log. mathematically equivalent to division by log(1.0003). --[[User:Lement\|Lement]] (13:36, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

			10b didb't enable some math notations to image function on mediawiki? that's bit of hard to read without regular math presentation --[[User:Ewq23\|Ewq23]] ([[User talk:Ewq23\|talk]]) 15:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Lement at 13:35, 25 June 2013

2013-06-25T13:35:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:35, 25 June 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	what does the comma mean? --[[User:Ewq23\|Ewq23]] ([[User talk:Ewq23\|talk]]) 00:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)		what does the comma mean? --[[User:Ewq23\|Ewq23]] ([[User talk:Ewq23\|talk]]) 00:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

			It means the base of the log. mathematically equivalent to division by log(1.0003). --[[User:Lement\|Lement]] (13:36, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Ewq23 at 00:11, 24 June 2013

2013-06-24T00:11:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:11, 24 June 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
			(log(3330 + INT * 2 + WIS , 1.0003) - 27039.81)

			what does the comma mean? --[[User:Ewq23\|Ewq23]] ([[User talk:Ewq23\|talk]]) 00:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)




	== Accuracy ==		== Accuracy ==
	Isn't "Every point raises Magic Points by 1 except for every fourth point" just +0.75 MP per wisdom point?		Isn't "Every point raises Magic Points by 1 except for every fourth point" just +0.75 MP per wisdom point?

Varst at 08:03, 5 September 2012

2012-09-05T08:03:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:03, 5 September 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	If every fourth point means to say that on quantity divisible by 4, then this is just means at 0 wisdom there is a non integer value for MP otherwise it would be every n-1 wisdom does not grant an MP point where n is wisdom values divisible by four.		If every fourth point means to say that on quantity divisible by 4, then this is just means at 0 wisdom there is a non integer value for MP otherwise it would be every n-1 wisdom does not grant an MP point where n is wisdom values divisible by four.
	-mrttao		-mrttao

			You can test that yourself (And you should.) [[User:Varst\|Varst]] 08:03, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Mrttao: /* Accuracy */

2012-09-04T22:25:13Z

Accuracy

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 4 September 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Accuracy ==		== Accuracy ==
	~~It is worth noting that the formulas~~ for ~~accuracy show percent changes are applied to the miss chance not the hit chance~~.		Isn't "Every point raises Magic Points by 1 except for every fourth point" just +0.75 MP per wisdom point?
	~~This~~ is ~~important because the % reduction in miss chance~~ is ~~significantly less then~~ a ~~% increase of hit chances due the base~~ value ~~of miss being 20% and the base value of hit being 80%.~~		If every fourth point means to say that on quantity divisible by 4, then this is just means at 0 wisdom there is a non integer value for MP otherwise it would be every n-1 wisdom does not grant an MP point where n is wisdom values divisible by four.
	~~Furthermore, because~~ it ~~calculates as a reduction of miss chances, multiple sources diminish your returns rather then amplify it. (100 * 0.5 * 0.5 = 25; delta of~~ -75%; 100 * 1~~.5 * 1.5 = 225; delta of +125%)~~.
	-mrttao		-mrttao

Mrttao: /* Accuracy */

2012-06-28T21:38:17Z

Accuracy

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 28 June 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	This is important because the % reduction in miss chance is significantly less then a % increase of hit chances due the base value of miss being 20% and the base value of hit being 80%.		This is important because the % reduction in miss chance is significantly less then a % increase of hit chances due the base value of miss being 20% and the base value of hit being 80%.
	Furthermore, because it calculates as a reduction of miss chances, multiple sources diminish your returns rather then amplify it. (100 * 0.5 * 0.5 = 25; delta of -75%; 100 * 1.5 * 1.5 = 225; delta of +125%).		Furthermore, because it calculates as a reduction of miss chances, multiple sources diminish your returns rather then amplify it. (100 * 0.5 * 0.5 = 25; delta of -75%; 100 * 1.5 * 1.5 = 225; delta of +125%).
			-mrttao

Mrttao: Created page with "== Accuracy == It is worth noting that the formulas for accuracy show percent changes are applied to the miss chance not the hit chance. This is important because the % reduct..."

2012-06-28T21:38:03Z

Created page with "== Accuracy == It is worth noting that the formulas for accuracy show percent changes are applied to the miss chance not the hit chance. This is important because the % reduct..."

New page

== Accuracy ==
It is worth noting that the formulas for accuracy show percent changes are applied to the miss chance not the hit chance.
This is important because the % reduction in miss chance is significantly less then a % increase of hit chances due the base value of miss being 20% and the base value of hit being 80%.
Furthermore, because it calculates as a reduction of miss chances, multiple sources diminish your returns rather then amplify it. (100 * 0.5 * 0.5 = 25; delta of -75%; 100 * 1.5 * 1.5 = 225; delta of +125%).