Talk:twins: Difference between revisions
From EHWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Maximum Joe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Remember that the tag actually stands for "having sex with twins", hence why it was categorized as an "Activity". An "Attribute" implies that being a part of a pair of twins is enough for the tag. Be careful not to take master tags too literally. Using both categories for now. - [[User:Maximum Joe|Maximum Joe]] ([[User talk:Maximum Joe|talk]]) 17:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC) | Remember that the tag actually stands for "having sex with twins", hence why it was categorized as an "Activity". An "Attribute" implies that being a part of a pair of twins is enough for the tag. Be careful not to take master tags too literally. Using both categories for now. - [[User:Maximum Joe|Maximum Joe]] ([[User talk:Maximum Joe|talk]]) 17:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
:"Twin" could imply what you suggest. "Twin'''S'''" implies that ''both'' of the ''twins'' are taggable. Besides, if someone is already on this page and sees "Attribute", they can also see the definition. <_< If there's someone who can visit this page and manage to only draw conclusions from the Type, completely missing the Description, I somehow doubt that "Activity" is going to prevent them from mistagging. If you really feel it needs clarification, the best way is to add an explicit/loud note to the effect that "both twins must be having sex"; "Activity" is a wholly inadequate way to communicate that. [[User:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore|PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore]] ([[User talk:PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore|talk]]) 20:18, 9 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:18, 9 May 2013
Remember that the tag actually stands for "having sex with twins", hence why it was categorized as an "Activity". An "Attribute" implies that being a part of a pair of twins is enough for the tag. Be careful not to take master tags too literally. Using both categories for now. - Maximum Joe (talk) 17:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- "Twin" could imply what you suggest. "TwinS" implies that both of the twins are taggable. Besides, if someone is already on this page and sees "Attribute", they can also see the definition. <_< If there's someone who can visit this page and manage to only draw conclusions from the Type, completely missing the Description, I somehow doubt that "Activity" is going to prevent them from mistagging. If you really feel it needs clarification, the best way is to add an explicit/loud note to the effect that "both twins must be having sex"; "Activity" is a wholly inadequate way to communicate that. PeopleDon'tDanceNoMore (talk) 20:18, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
